We Have Numbers Of Free Samples
For Each Subject To Make A Difference In Your Grade
Final Report on MINI DIGGER
Total Views 707
Table of Content
- Material For Digger Bucket
- Hand Calculation for MINI DIGGER
- FEA Using SOLIDWORK
Materials For Digger Bucket
Pin
Excavator pins are commonly made of a AISI 4130 or 4140 steels. The AISI 4000 series of steels are chromium molybdenum steel. Chromium improves corrosion resistivity and its ability to be hardened, while molybdenum increases strength and hardenability, too. The 41 stands for its tensile strength: 283 MPa The last two digits are the percent carbon, as in 0.30% carbon for 4130 and 0.40% carbon for 4140.
The steel used will mostly heat treated using induction hardening. This heat treatment processes produces a hardened surface up to 58 to 63 Rockwell C for wear resistance with a internal ductile for toughness. Note that the bushings are often made of the same material as the pins. Some cheaper pins made of AISI 1045. This is a medium carbon steel that can hardened.
Bucket Side
The bucket sides and cutting edge are usually made of AR steel plate. The most popular grades are AR360 and AR400. AR 360 is a medium carbon, low alloy steel that is heat treated to provide excellent abrasion resistance and high impact strength. AR 400 has also been heat treated but it provides abrasion resistance and superior yield strength. Both of these steels have been carefully quenched and tempered to product qualities that are key to a good bucket. Note that the numbers after AR are the Brinell hardness of the steel.
Bucket Shell
The bucket shell is generally made of ASTM A572 Grade 50 (sometimes written A-572-50), a high strength, low alloy steel. This steels is alloyed with columbium and vanadium. Vanadium helps with maintaining the toughness of the steel. This grade of steel is desirable as a bucket shell material due to it provides excellent strength without weighing quite as much as comparable steels such as A36. It is also readily welded and formed.
Bucket Teeth
It is important to understand that there are two ways of manufacturing bucket teeths: casting and forging. Cast bucket teeth may be made of a low alloy steel with nickel and molybdenum as the primary alloying element. Molybdenum improves the harden ability and strength of the steel and can also help minimize some forms of pitting corrosion. Nickel increases strength, toughness, and also helps keep corrosion resistant. They may also be made from an austempered ductile iron that has undergone heat treatment for wear and impact strength. Forged bucket teeth are made from a heat treated alloy steel, but the type of steel varies with manufacturer. The heat treatment improves wear properties and increases impact strength.
2. Hand Calculation For MINI DIGGER
- Breakout force

Figure shows the measurement of bucket curling force FB, arm crowd force FS, the other terms in the figure dA, dB, dC, dD, dD1, dE, and dF shows the distances as shown in Figure.
According to SAE J1179: Maximum radial tooth force due to bucket cylinder (bucket curling force) FB is the digging force generated by the bucket cylinder and tangent to the arc of radius dD1. The bucket shall be positioned to obtain maximum output moment from the bucket cylinder and connecting linkage. FB becomes maximum when distance dA reaches maximum, because rest of the distances in the equation.
FB=Bucket cylinder force /dD( dA×dC)/dB
Where,
Bucket cylinder force = (Working pressure) × (End area of bucket cylinder)
If the end diameter of the bucket cylinder = DB (mm) and the working pressure is p (MPa) and other distances are in mm then the equation can be written as:
FB=p× π/4 ×DB2/dD×dA×dC/dB
FB= 18.996 KN
- Bucket static force analysis
Bellow Figure shows the free body diagram of the bucket Forces. As can be seen the reaction force on the bucket teeth at point A4 due to the breakout force 18.996 KN acts at the angle 38.23° for configuration of the maximum breakout force condition.
Fb= 18.996 KN
At Angle 38.23°
- Free body diagram of bucket
Static forces on joints can be calculated by considering the summation of force must be equal to zero (ΣF = 0) and summation of moment equal to zero (ΣM = 0) for equilibrium condition of the bucket, arm and boom respectively.
All the force in the Fig. Firstly the reaction force acting on the bucket teeth (at point A4) is resolved in the horizontal (X) and the vertical (Y) directions using following equations,
F4H=FB∙cosρ
F4V=FB∙sinρ
Where, ρ is the angle between the breakout force of bucket and the ground level as horizontal reference surface of 38.23º as shown in Fig.;
F4H=14.921KN
F4H=11.755KN
Now considering the bucket in equilibrium ΣM = 0, taking moment about the bucket hinge point A3,

F4∙l4−Fgb∙lgb=F11∙l11
Where, F4 is the force acting at bucket tool tip when the bucket approaches to the earth in the maximum breakout force condition as shown in Fig., which is equivalent to the bucket breakout force FB.
- l4 is the distance of the tool tip of the bucket from the bucket hinge point.
- lgb is the distance between the C.G. of the bucket to the bucket hinge point.
- l11 is the distance of the bucket hinge point to the 117
- idler link hinge point on bucket.
- Fgb is the gravitational force acting on bucket.
- F11 is the force acting on hinge point of the idler link on bucket which can be found by using equation
Acting at an angle β11 of 64º as shown in Fig. The force F11 can be resolved in horizontal (X) and the vertical (Y) directions by using the following equations.
F11H=F11∙cos β11
F11V=F11∙sin β11
Fgb= 0.10437 ( FOR A2 TOOL STEEL AS BUCKET MATERIAL )
- Resolving vertical Forces
With Upper Equation and Dimension from Above Fig.
|
Vertical Upward |
|
Horizontal |
|
Vertical Downward |
|
Horizontal |
A3 = 29.66260 KN
- Bucket pin design
The resultant force of these forces is acting at the bucket pin which is higher than that of the force acting on bucket pin for dumping cycle. Therefore, the maximum force is considered for checking the design of bucket pin. The bucket pin is checked for bearing, shear and bending failure.
first check the bucket pin for bearing failure. The total length of the bucket pin is 165mm. But for the calculations, the effective length of the bucket pin (the part of bucket pin which is in paired with the arm) is considered.
Let,
Diameter of bucket pin, db=30 mm
Shear stress of bucket pin material (IS 1403), τ =56 MPa
Bearing pressure of bucket pin material (IS 2062), pb =40 MPa
Total length of the bucket pin, lpb=165 mm
Effective length of the bucket pin, lpbe=165 mm
Horizontal component of force acting at bucket hinge point A3, F3H= 27.93 N
Vertical component of force acting at bucket hinge point A3, F3V= 9.9827 N
ymax=db/2 = 15 mm
The resultant force acting on the bucket pin is,
Fpb=F3= 29662.60 N
Also, the bearing force acting on the bucket pin is,
Fpb=db*lpbe*pb
∴pb=5.99 MPa < pb =40 MPa
Here, the bearing pressure induced in the bucket pint is very less compared to the allowable bearing pressure of bucket pin material AISI4130 as 40MPa. So, the bucket pin is safe in bearing.
Considering bucket pin is in double shear and the shear area of the bucket pin is,
Apb=2*π/4*(db)2
Now, shear force acting on the bucket pin is,
Fpbfs=2*π/4* db 2*τshear
we get the shear stresses developed in the bucket pin is,
Fpb=Fpbfs
Fpb=2*π/4*(db)2*ηshear
ηshear=20.99 MPa< =56 MPa
Here, the shear stresses developed in the bucket pin is very less compared to allowable shear stress of bucket pin material ASIS 4130 as 42 MPa. So, the bucket pin is safe in shear.
Consider bucket pin as simply supported beam with uniformly distributed loading condition and now let us check bucket pin for bending failure.
Now, the uniformly distributed load acting on bucket pin is, wb=Fpb*lpbe
wb=179.77 N/mm
Maximum bending moment occurs at the bucket pin is,
Mb=Wb*lpbe2/8
Mb=6.11×105 N∙mm
Now, the moment of inertia of the bucket pin is,
Ib=π/64(db)4
Ib=3.98×104 mm4
The maximum bending stress developed in the bucket pin is,
Ζmax/ymax= Mb/Ib
ζmax=σb=230.56 MPa< σb =500 MPa
The maximum bending stress developed in the bucket pin is within the stress limit of the bucket pin material, therefore the design of bucket pin is safe in bending.
3.3 FEA USING SOLIDWORK
From the FEA Analysis the BUCKET PIN is safe and minimum factor of shefty is 2.7.
It is near about to hand calculation.
The simulation report generated by solidworks is below;
Model Information

Model name: Pin
Current Configuration: with split
Study Properties
| Study name | 165Pin |
| Analysis type | Static |
| Mesh type | Solid Mesh |
| Thermal Effect: | On |
| Thermal option | Include temperature loads |
| Zero strain temperature | 298 Kelvin |
| Include fluid pressure effects from SOLIDWORKS | Off |
| Flow Simulation | |
| Solver type | FFEPlus |
| Inplane Effect: | Off |
| Soft Spring: | Off |
| Inertial Relief: | Off |
| Incompatible bounding options | Automatic |
| Large displacement | Off |
| Compute free body forces | On |
| Friction | Off |
| Use Adaptive Method: | Off |
Units
| Unit system: | SI (MKS) |
| Length/Displacement | mm |
| Temperature | Kelvin |
| Angular velocity | Rad/sec |
| Pressure/Stress | N/m^2 |
Material Properties

Load and Fixtures


Mesh information
| Mesh type | Solid Mesh |
| Mesher Used: | Standard mesh |
| Automatic Transition: | Off |
| Include Mesh Auto Loops: | Off |
| Jacobian points | 4 Points |
| Element Size | 4.88731 mm |
| Tolerance | 0.244365 mm |
| Mesh Quality Plot | High |
Mesh information – Details
| Total Nodes | 10004 |
| Total Elements | 6415 |
| Maximum Aspect Ratio | 3.0954 |
| % of elements with Aspect Ratio < 3 | 100 |
| % of elements with Aspect Ratio > 10 | 0 |
| % of distorted elements(Jacobian) | 0 |
| Time to complete mesh(hh;mm;ss): | 00:00:00 |
| Computer name: | |
![]() |
|
|---|---|
Resultant Forces
Reaction forces
| Selection set | Units | Sum X | Sum Y | Sum Z | Resultant |
| Entire Model | N | 0.27388 | 29662.6 | -0.0462036 | 29662.6 |
Reaction Moments
| Selection set | Units | Sum X | Sum Y | Sum Z | Resultant |
| Entire Model | N.m | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Results
| Name | Type | MinX | Max |
| Stress1 | VON: von Mises Stress | 1.051e+006N/m^2 Node: 785 |
1.723e+008N/m^2 Node: 6863 |
![]() |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Pin-165Pin-Stress-Stress1
| Name | Type | MinX | Max |
| Displacement | URES: Resultant Displacement | 0.000e+000mm Node: 1 |
3.197e-002mm Node: 7787 |
![]() |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Type | MinX | Max |
| Strain1 | ESTRN: Equivalent Strain | 3.932e-006 Element: 391 |
6.232e-004 Element: 2043 |
![]() |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Pin-165Pin-Strain-Strain1
| Name | Type | MinX | Max |
| Factor of Safety1 | Automatic | 2.669e+000 Node: 6863 |
4.375e+002 Node: 785 |
![]() |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Pin-165Pin-Factor of Safety-Factor of Safety1
Conclusion
- From the Analytic and FEA Simulation model it is prove that the BUCKET PIN is Safe against 15 MPa working pressure of bucket cylinder and this configuration of maximum Digging and break out force.
BookMyEssay which is operated by highly talented Australian writers who remain enthusiastic to deliver their all assignment help services at any hour of the day. These sites function 24 by 7, thus can be contacted at any point of time for writing help. Students can now switch to urgent essay assignment help along with securing the requisite assistance from these writing professionals to understand the subject better.
Download
505
Size
140.91 KB
File Type
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]



